Copyright © 2017 Southern Coastal Group. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy & Cookie Guidance  |  Web design & maintenance

Working with

The Southern Coastal Group

Coastal Monitoring

Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coastline

www.channelcoast.org www.scopac.org.uk

Our Website

SCG Committee

Home

Strategies & Plans

About SCG

Publications

SCG Members

Downloads

SCG Meetings

Useful Links

Events

Copyright Notice

Research

Contact Us

Home / About

Chairman

Mr Neil Watson, Environment Agency

Vice-Chair

Mr Dave Robson, Borough of Poole

Research Chair

Dr Samantha Cope, Havant Borough Council

Current Research

SurgeWatch: a user-friendly database of coastal flooding for the UK

SCOPAC Contaminated Land Study

Scanning of historical aerial photography

Beach response in front of structures in open coast

Poole Bay Nearshore Replenishment Trial

Reducing regional flood and erosion risk from wave action on the Channel Coast

Update of the SCOPAC Sediment Transport Study

Maintenance of coastal structures - Phase 1: Timber groynes

Completed Research

Bradbury’s Bursary: investigating the physical and geotechnical properties of the substrate in the lee of Hurst Spit

Offshore to onshore transport across distinct landforms at Church Norton Spit

Coastal sediment budget project: Minor Funds Contribution

Seabed Mapping Selsey to Eastoke: Minor Funds Contribution 2013-2015

Sediment Tracer Study Phase II: Minor Funds Contributions 2011-2013

Non-Standard Rock Groynes: Minor Funds Contributions 2011-2013

Sediment Tracer Study Phase I: Minor Funds Contributions 2010-2011

ACCESS Project

Extreme Wave Conditions within the SCOPAC region

Strategic Regional Coastal Monitoring

RESPONSE European Project

SCOPAC Sediment Transport Study 2004

SCOPAC Sediment Transport Bibliographic Database v6, 2012

Evolution of the Solent River animation

Evolution of Lyme Bay animation

Preparing for the Impacts of Climate Change

Timber groynes are widely used across the SCOPAC region and have been for many years at some locations. Some operating authorities report that maintenance of these structures occupies a significant proportion of their revenue coast protection expenditure, on an annual basis. Others carry out minimal maintenance of structures.

In view of the frequent use of timber groynes, it is quite remarkable that there are no publications that deal specifically with practical aspects of groyne management. Although the initial design of groynes is provided in industry standard publications, maintenance merits minimal discussion and practical issues are never addressed. The SCOPAC study on Maintenance of Timber Groynes seeks to cover this gap.

Maintenance of coastal structures -

Phase 1: Timber groynes

The cost of capital groyne replacement is very high and the effective extension of life of structures, through efficient maintenance, may make the difference between financially sustainable systems and those which are not cost effective as a management solution.

Although the current grant aid structure requires applications to be supported by full life cycle assessment of costs, the funding system does not make full provision for funding of life cycle maintenance works through grant in aid; this consequently encourages poor or no maintenance at some locations. Further to this the grant aid calculations discriminate between EA and local authority schemes, on the basis of the varied basis for the revenue funding for the two types of organisations. Assessments do not reflect recent changes to the funding of local authorities, which no longer identify coast protection as a discrete line within the budget. Examination of structures within the region suggests that maintenance is conducted very infrequently at many sites. In fact it appears that some structures may be unmaintained throughout their life. There is clear evidence that structures can degrade quickly and fail to provide the function for which they were originally designed. This has a serious implication for lifecycle costs. In many instances improved maintenance could provide cost effective extension of life of these structures.

As with many maintenance activities, procedures and processes have been developed at various locations over many years, often on a trial and error basis. Some of these processes have resulted in increasingly efficient management. Regrettably these experiences have hitherto not generally been documented, although internal procedures are often logged within operating authorities' internal management systems. Changing approaches to management within coastal operating authorities have meant that there are now fewer skilled engineers working with these structures on a day to day basis, and some considerable practical knowledge is gradually being lost. The SCOPAC report seeks to capture the experiences of local engineers and to share these experiences with others. The document captures both techniques that have been considered to be successful, and those which have worked less well. In an attempt to capture the experiences of less successful approaches, these have been documented but not attributed to specific sites, thereby providing assessments of techniques that some may be considering.

The objective of the document is not to provide a prescriptive solution to maintenance, but to offer a range of alternative approaches, and risks together with experiences of their success. Some of the techniques have generic applicability and others may be site specific. The document is intended for use by those wishing to share these experiences.

The initial design of structures and plan shape layout of groyne systems is dealt with extremely well elsewhere and the focus of this document is on maintenance of structures that have already been constructed. Some of the procedures discussed here should be considered at the design stage however, since they may allow for more efficient maintenance if integrated into the design process. Since maintenance is not considered in any detail in these documents, designers of new structures may benefit from the experiences of structure performance however; this may allow modification of structural detailing to improve long term performance and life cycle costs. The document provides details on the following key areas.